Skip to main content

Lumi vs UserWay

Why accessibility widgets don't replace real scanning

UserWay offers an accessibility overlay widget and a separate scanning tool. While their scanner is a step up from their widget, the company is primarily known for its overlay product. Like other overlay providers, UserWay's widget approach has been criticised by accessibility professionals for not fixing underlying code issues.

Feature
Lumi
UserWay
Approach
Find & fix issues
Overlay + scanner
Scanning engines
5
1
Fixes underlying code
Screen reader safe
Widget can interfere
WCAG 2.2 checks
Keyboard testing
CI/CD integration
No site JavaScript
Score tracking
Limited
Scan comparison
Slack/webhook alerts
Starting price
£29/mo
$49/mo

What Lumi finds that UserWay misses

Finds and reports actual code-level issues rather than masking them
Five scanning engines for comprehensive coverage
No JavaScript injected into your site - zero performance impact
CI/CD API prevents new accessibility issues from shipping
Score tracking shows real compliance progress over time
WCAG 2.2 checks included by default
Transparent about what automated scanning can and can't catch

Where UserWay falls short

Primary product is an overlay widget - same fundamental problems as accessiBe
Overlays don't fix underlying HTML/CSS/ARIA issues
Criticised by disability advocacy organisations
Scanner is secondary to the overlay business
Can interfere with assistive technologies
No CI/CD integration for developer workflows

Want to see the difference on your own site?

Run a live comparison - enter any URL and see axe-core vs Lumi results side by side. No account required.

Start monitoring with five-engine scanning from £29/mo. 14-day free trial, cancel anytime.

Get accessibility insights in your inbox

WCAG guides, scanner updates, and industry news. No spam.